Return to Main Page

C. CURRICULUM CONTENT AND EVALUATION

The Curriculum section first describes Robinson College of Business'(RCB) organizational responsibilities and processes for curriculum planning, development, evaluation, and revision. Then the programs of the college are presented with respect to program content and structure, satisfaction of curriculum content standards, and assessment in the following order:

Next, processes for assuring student compliance with curriculum content specifications are addressed. Finally, plans for curriculum development over the next five years are discussed.

CURRICULUM PLANNING, EVALUATION, AND REVISION

Organizational Responsibilities. [Standard C.2] From a college-level administrative perspective, curriculum planning, development, assessment, and revision are managed by the associate dean with responsibility for the specific program working with the Undergraduate Program Council (UPC) or the Graduate Program Council (GPC). Each program council consists of five faculty members -- a chair, who is appointed by the dean, and four other members, who are elected by the RCB faculty. Members serve staggered terms of three years. The appropriate associate dean serves as an ex-officio member of each council. The director of the Office of Academic Assistance (which is responsible for managing master's-level admissions and student advisement) and appropriate administrative staff from the Dean's Office also participate in and support the deliberations of the program councils. The RCB Bylaws (Reference P-3, Section IV-D) charge the program councils with the following responsibilities:

Develop consistent academic goals which consider the independent and interrelated missions of the university, the college, and the academic units within the focus of the strategic plan of the college. Implement a process for review, evaluation, and recommendation of the academic proposals from any of the above units which may affect the academic goals of the college. Proposals from academic units will originate with a curriculum committee in the academic unit and be approved by the faculty of the academic unit.

Develop and evaluate policies dealing with academic issues within the college on topics such as: admission criteria, graduation criteria, probation and

suspension, and other academic standards. All new policies or changes in policies of this type require review and legislative approval by the faculty.

Develop and implement criteria and procedures for monitoring and reviewing solicited and unsolicited petitions for additions, deletions, or revisions of programs of study, academic unit majors, courses, and degree requirements within academic units for which degree credit is granted.

Monitor the ongoing process of assessment of degree programs from reports provided by the associate dean or other dean's designee with academic programs responsibility.

Create any required ad hoc committee to study specific issues related to academic programs and policies within the jurisdiction of the program council, and to authorize research activities for internal support consistent with the implementation of any of the above issues. The recommendations of the ad hoc committees and the results of the research efforts will be reported to the appropriate council for its consideration in deliberation of issues.

Respond appropriately to any requests or charges received from the faculty or the dean.

Forward all recommendations through the associate dean or other dean's designee with responsibility for academic programs to the dean for formal review and legislative approval by the faculty as specified in Section I.C of these bylaws.

Prepare minutes of each meeting and distribute them to the Executive Committee and the Faculty Affairs Committee.

Curriculum Planning, Development, and Approval Processes. [Standard C.2.1] Curriculum planning and development typically occurs within faculty groups that are directly involved in the delivery of each program. For the specialized master's programs and for concentrations/majors in the BBA, MBA, and PhD programs, these faculty groups are primarily within the academic units. Each academic unit has established written policies and procedures that govern the curriculum planning, development, and unit-level faculty approval process (see Reference C-1, Curriculum Planning). For the general structure/requirements of the BBA, MBA, and PhD programs, the faculty groups involved in curriculum planning are cross-disciplinary and include the UPC, GPC, MBA Faculty Group, and Doctoral Program Coordinators.

Faculty groups involved in curriculum planning and development seek input from the RCB Advisory Board, unit-level advisory boards, discipline-specific executive RoundTables, alumni, and other appropriate sources. Once approved at the academic unit or cross-disciplinary faculty group level, all curriculum proposals are forwarded to the UPC or GPC for review. The program council reviews the proposal for consistency with the college mission and for compliance with curriculum standards imposed by the University System of Georgia, Georgia State University, AACSB, and the RCB. Questions and concerns raised by the program council are addressed by the source of the proposal. If all questions and concerns are resolved to the satisfaction of the program council, the council recommends the proposal for faculty approval at the next RCB faculty meeting. These recommendations are communicated prior to the faculty meeting through a motions memorandum from each program council, and at least one open faculty hearing on the motions memorandum is held prior to the faculty meeting by each program council. Following RCB faculty approval, proposals for the creation or deletion of degree programs or majors within existing programs must be submitted to the university and the university system for approval.

Program Assessment and Revision Processes. [Standard C.2.2] In 1996, the college began the process of developing and implementing a formal program assessment process. Groups of faculty were appointed as assessment teams for each program, and a faculty member with strong empirical research skills was appointed to coordinate the effort for the college. An assessment manual was developed for the college, and several workshops were held to train faculty in program assessment methodologies. Then the program assessment teams set about the task of developing an assessment plan for each program.

The assessment plan for each program begins with the mission statement for the program, which must be consistent with and supportive of the mission statement of the college. A guiding principle is that each program mission statement indicates as concisely as possible what constituency is served and what value is created by the program for that constituency. For most programs, the previously existing mission statements were found to be inadequate for assessment purposes, so they were rewritten as necessary. Each program mission statement has been reviewed by the appropriate program council and approved by the RCB faculty. Based on the mission statement, program objectives provide specific, though not necessarily measurable, statements of the intended impact of the program on the student. For each program objective, one or more expected outcomes translate the program objective into a measurable statement(s) of program impact in terms of knowledge imparted, skills developed, career placement/advancement, etc. Finally, for each expected outcome, one or more assessment methods are specified -- including, for example: comprehensive exams, evaluations of student projects, and surveys of students, alumni and employers. Assessment teams were cautioned to develop assessment plans that reflect realistic goals and involve assessment methods that are supportable with available resources.

As assessment plans were developed for each program, they were submitted to the RCB assessment coordinator for review. Most assessment plans went through several developmental drafts incorporating suggestions for improvement provided by the assessment coordinator. Assessment instruments (e.g., exams, surveys, etc.) were then developed. All of this developmental effort took place as GSU, along with the entire University System of Georgia, was converting all program curricula from the quarter system to the semester system. The actual conversion to the semester system occurred in fall, 1998. The 1998-99 academic year is the first year in which the assessment plans have been applied to all programs. Reference C-2, RCB College Assessment Plans and Results, presents for each program:

The college has a clear policy with supporting responsibilities and procedures (Reference M-1: RCB Policies and Procedures Manual, item C-1) for ongoing assessment of academic programs. Although program assessment is expected to be a continuous process within the program assessment teams, each program will be subjected to review by the Undergraduate or Graduate Program Council at least once every five years. This process will be coordinated with a similar periodic review process that is mandated and conducted at the university level. The program council will communicate its findings to the program director, along with guidance for correcting any deficiencies and suggestions for improvement of the program or the curriculum planning/assessment process. The program council will follow up to ensure appropriate action is taken.

Henceforth, a complete assessment plan (structured as described above) must be included in any curriculum proposal that would create a new program or significantly change the mission, objectives, content, or requirements of an existing program. The assessment plan will be reviewed by the appropriate program council along with the proposed curriculum. Final approval of such a proposal by the RCB faculty will include approval of the assessment plan.

UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM

The mission of the Bachelor of Business Administration (BBA) program is provided in Section M (Mission and Objectives) of this report. The BBA program objectives are presented in Table C--4.

Program Content and Structure. The BBA degree program has two major segments -- the core curriculum of the University System of Georgia and the business core and major. The freshman and sophomore years of the BBA program include 60 semester hours of course work designated as Core Areas A-F that satisfy the core curriculum of the University System of Georgia (Table C--1).

Table C--1

BBA Core Curriculum -- University System of Georgia

 

Core Area

 

Description

 

Semester Hours

 

A

 

English Composition

Mathematics

 

6

3

 

B

 

Institutional Options

  • Critical Thinking
  • Human Communication

 

 

2

2

 

C

 

Humanities and Fine Arts1

  • Humanities
  • Fine Arts

 

 

3

3

 

D

 

Science, Mathematics and Technology

  • Laboratory Science
  • Mathematics

 

 

8

3

 

E

 

Social Sciences

  • Political Science
  • History
  • Social Science Electives

 

 

3

3

6

 

F

 

Business Foundation

  • Accounting
  • Economics
  • Computer Information Systems
  • The Environment of Business

 

 

6

6

3

3

1 A foreign language can substitute for a humanities or fine arts course in Area C.

Source: Reference S-1: 1998-99 GSU General Catalog, pp.240-242.

Undergraduate business students are introduced to business disciplines in Core Area F. The remaining business core courses are encountered in the junior year, including the BusA 4980 capstone course normally taken in the final semester. Table C--2 lists the business core courses in the BBA program.

Table C--2

BBA Business Core Courses

 

Course Number

 

Course Title

 

Semester Hours

 

Acct 2101

 

Principles of Accounting I

 

3

 

Acct 2102

 

Principles of Accounting II

 

3

 

Econ 2105

 

Principles of Macroeconomics

 

3

 

Econ 2106

 

Principles of Microeconomics

 

3

 

CIS 2010

 

Introduction to Computer Based Information Systems

 

3

 

BusA 2106

 

The Environment of Business

 

3

 

DSc 3100

 

Introduction to Business Statistics

 

3

 

DSc 3120

 

General Modeling Techniques with Applications

 

3

 

Fi 3300

 

Corporation Finance

 

3

 

Mgt 3500

 

Management Concepts, Theory and Practice

 

3

 

Mk 3010

 

Basis Marketing

 

3

 

BCom 3950

 

Managerial Communication

 

3

 

BusA 4980

 

Strategic Management/Policy

 

3

 

TOTAL

 

 

 

39

In addition to the university core and business core courses requirements, BBA students select a major (18-21 hours), junior/senior business electives (6-12 hours) and junior/senior electives from the College of Arts and Sciences (9 hours). A strength of the RCB is the scope of specialization permitted by the size of the college. Eleven BBA majors are offered, including unique business disciplines such as actuarial science, hospitality administration, and risk management and insurance. This feature greatly enhances the attractiveness of the BBA program outside the local area and region. (Reference: S-1, 1998-99 GSU General Catalog, pp. 243-244.)

Satisfaction of Curriculum Content Standards. The RCB understands that students must appreciate the various perspectives that form the context of business. An examination of BBA core course syllabi and a survey of the academic units (Table C--3) indicates inclusion of these perspectives as specified in Standard C.1.1 in the required BBA courses.

The general education component comprises at least 50% of the BBA program [Standard C.1.2.a] when you consider that six semester hours of economics (Econ 2105 and Econ 2106), three semester hours of statistics (DSc 3100) and nine semester hours of A&S electives are part of the general education component of the BBA program.

Standard C.1.2.b is satisfied by Core Areas E and F that require an appropriate exposure to the foundation disciplines of accounting, economics, mathematics and statistics (Table C--1). In addition, the BBA business core courses offer additional content exposure to these disciplines

(Table C--2). The behavioral science requirement can be met through a social sciences elective in Core Area E. The University System of Georgia requires all institutions to offer a broad array of social sciences electives that include courses in behavioral science (psychology and sociology), however the RCB cannot specify certain electives for BBA students.

Table C--3

AACSB Perspectives in BBA Courses

Required

Courses

Ethical Issues

Global Issues

Political,

Social Issues

Legal, Regulatory, Environmental Issues

Technological Issues

Demographic

Diversity

Acct 2101

*

*

*

*

*

 

Acct 2102

 

*

 

 

 

 

Econ 2105

 

***

**

**

*

 

Econ 2106

*

**

***

***

**

 

CIS 2010

*

*

*

*

***

 

BusA 2106

**

*

**

***

 

 

DSc 3100

*

 

*

*

*

 

DSc 3120

*

 

*

**

***

 

Fi 3300

*

*

*

*

*

 

Mgt 3500

*

**

*

**

**

*

Mk 3010

*

*

*

**

**

*

BCom 3950

*

 

*

*

**

*

BusA 4980

 

**

**

**

**

*

Legend: *** = Major coverage (more than 25% of course content)

** = Moderate coverage (10% to 25% of course content)

* = Minor coverage (less than 10% of course content)

blank = No significant coverage

Standard C.1.2.c is addressed in several areas. Core Area B requires a course in Human Communications. In the junior year there is a business communications requirement that can be satisfied by one of three communication courses. The capstone course (BusA 4980) also has a significant communications component. Finally, many of the academic units require written and oral communications as a integral part of the major courses.

Standard C.1.2.d is satisfied by a consistency between the mission of the BBA program and the additional degree requirements beyond the business core. A strength of the RCB BBA program is the degree of specialization available to undergraduate students. The major course requirements are determined by each academic unit and approved by the Undergraduate Program Council. A major consists of 18 to 21 semester hours. The remaining hours in the BBA program consist of junior/senior business electives (6-12 hours) and junior/senior Arts & Sciences electives (9 hours). Specific course requirements for each major can be found in Reference S-1: 1998-99 GSU General Catalog. (Pp. 246-256)

Standard C.1.2.e is satisfied by the requirement that at least 50% of the business credit hours required for the BBA degree must be earned at GSU (1998-99 GSU General Catalog, p. 239). The following courses are considered Abusiness credit hours@:

Assessment Plan. Table C--4 on page 34 presents the assessment plan for the BBA program. The primary assessment methods consist of a written test of core business knowledge and surveys of our major stakeholders. The Business II test provided by Education Testing Service (ETS) is administered to all BBA students as part of the BusA 4980 capstone course. This ETS test analyses core business knowledge, and provides percentile scores for RCB students. The percentile scores for each of the core business areas are shown in Table C--5. The results of this test may indicate where core course improvement is necessary. The UPC reviews these test data as part of the continuous improvement of the BBA program.

Table C--5

Results of Business II Test

Educational Testing Service (Percentile Rankings)

Content Area

Fall

1997

Spring

1998

Fall

1998

Spring 1999

Accounting

79 %

71 %

71 %

73 %

Economics

54

48

50

54

Management

72

59

67

80

Quantitative Business Analysis

84

53

58

70

Finance

68

83

80

78

Marketing

67

82

62

70

Legal and Social Environment

77

74

71

76

International Issues

64

63

52

63

Source: ETS Business II Test Results

Assessment surveys are used to provide feedback from three important stakeholder groups -- graduating students, alumni and employers of our graduates. In addition to assessing the achievement of program objectives and expected outcomes of the BBA program, the surveys also ask respondents to comment on such things as the learning environment, course scheduling, student services, continuing education activities and career success. The results of this portion of the surveys are reviewed by the UPC and shared with the appropriate service providers as part of the continuing improvement process. The results of these assessment surveys are provided in Reference C-2.

Table C--4 Assessment Plan for BBA Program

 

Program Objectives

 

Expected Outcomes

 

Assessment Method

 

Student will demonstrate effective communication skills

 

Synthesizing, arranging and presenting complex material competently in both written and oral form and adapting presentations to specific audiences and purposes

 

  • Review sample of student writing oral presentations and multi-media presentations in BA core courses (particularly BCom 3950 and BusA 4980)
  • Survey of employers
  • Survey of alumni

 

Student will effectively use computer technology

 

Exhibiting competency with computer software (word processing, spreadsheets, graphics).

 

  • Review sample of computer output generated on core courses (particularly
  • DSc 3120 and BusA 4980) by faculty.
  • Survey of employers
  • Survey of alumni

 

Students will demonstrate analytical skills in solving business problems

 

Understanding the core knowledge areas of business

 

  • ETS examination

 

 

 

Recognizing the influence of political, ethical, global, social, demographic, regulatory, environmental and technical issues on the business organization.

 

  • Survey of employers
  • Survey of alumni

 

Students will function effectively as a team member.

 

 

Exhibiting the ability to interact effectively as a group or team member.

 

 

  • Peer/self evaluations as administered in BusA 4980
  • Survey of employers
  • Survey of alumni

 

Students will demonstrate an appreciation for learning as a life long process

 

Establishing and maintaining memberships in professional organizations of their chosen career and continuing to read literature and periodicals in their career fields

 

  • Survey of alumni

 

At the end of each term BBA students complete a course evaluation form for each course taken that term which assesses the value of the course and the performance of the instructor. A number of attributes are examined, with one global question asking students for their perception of the relative worth of the course. The results of the BBA core course ratings for the last five years are provided in Table C--6.

Table C--6

BBA Student Ratings of BBA Core Courses

 

 

 

 

 

1994

 

 

1995

 

 

1996

 

 

1997

 

 

1998

 

 

MEAN RATING*

 

 

3.7

 

 

3.8

 

 

3.8

 

 

3.8

 

 

3.8

* 1 = not at all worthwhile, 3 = Moderately worthwhile, 5 = extremely worthwhile

 

 

Finally, the RCB participates in the AACSB/EBI Undergraduate Student Satisfaction Study. For purposes of comparison, the RCB Undergraduate Program Council chose the following six schools as peer institutions from among the schools available based on perceived similarities in their undergraduate teaching missions and the qualifications of the students served:

The BBA program scored particularly well in the quality of teaching of required courses and major business courses. The overall satisfaction rating of the RCB BBA program is compared with the selected peer group and all schools included in the study in Table C--7. Data for the 1999 administration are pending.

Table C--7

Results of AACSB/EBI Undergraduate Student Satisfaction Study

Ratings of Overall Satisfaction, 1998 & 1999

 

 

 

Overall Satisfaction Rating*

 

 

 

 

1998

 

1999

 

RCB BBA Program

 

5.02

 

data pending

 

Peer Group

 

4.85

 

 

 

All Schools

 

4.86

 

 

* Ratings on a scale from 1 to 7, with 7 representing highest level of satisfaction

These data are used by the UPC along with the other BBA assessment information to gauge our success in meeting BBA program objectives and expected outcomes. This assessment process is critical to the continuous improvement of the BBA program.

MBA PROGRAMS

The Master of Business Administration (MBA) program in its several formats is the flagship program of the RCB by which the college is most widely recognized for quality, innovation, and flexibility. The mission of the MBA program is provided in Section M (Mission and Objectives) of this report. The MBA program objectives are presented in Table C--10. During the 1998-99 academic year the college offered the MBA program in three formats as described in the following sections. (Reference S-2: 1999-98 RCB Graduate Bulletin)

Master of Business Administration

This program is frequently called the "regular" or "flexible" MBA program. It is designed primarily for part-time students, although some students pursue this program on a full-time basis.

Program Content and Structure.

Noncredit Requirements: MBA Orientation

Business Communications Skills Workshop

Group A: Foundation Courses (0-12 semester hours). These courses, if assigned, must be taken first.

Econ 2105. Principles of Macroeconomics (3 hours)

Econ 2106. Principles of Microeconomics (3 hours)

MBA 8041. Statistical Analysis for Managers (3 hours)

MBA 8121. Accounting for Financial Decisions (3 hours)

Group B: Core Courses (9-12 semester hours). One of these courses may be exempted based on substantial academic background. Specific exemption criteria are specified for each course.

MBA 8412. Organizational Behavior (3 hours)

MBA 8452. Systems and Operations Management (3 hours)

MBA 8622. Corporation Finance (3 hours)

MBA 8642. Marketing Management (3 hours)

Group C: Required Courses Beyond the Core (15 semester hours). Any of these courses can be exempted based on specified criteria, but exempted courses in this group must be replaced by an 8000-level RCB course for which prerequisites have been satisfied (except MBA 8041, MBA 8121, or a Group B course that has been exempted).

MBA 8403. Economics for Managers (3 hours)

MBA 8423. Law and Ethics in Business and Employment Environments (3 hours)

MBA 8473. Information Technology and Decision Strategy (3 hours)

MBA 8683. Managerial Accounting and Control (3 hours)

MBA 8993. Strategic and International Management (3 hours)

or

IB 8990. Policy and Strategy in the International Marketplace (3 hours)

Group D: Concentration (12 semester hrs). Requirements of graduate-level coursework for each available concentration are specified. Concentrations available as of fall semester, 1998, are:

Accounting Hospitality Administration

Decision Sciences International Business

Economics Management

Electronic Commerce Marketing

Finance Personnel and Employment Relations

General Business Real Estate

Information Systems Risk Management and Insurance

In addition, a concentration in health administration has been approved by the faculty and will be available in spring semester, 1999.

Group E: 8000-Level RCB Elective (3 semester hours). This elective may be chosen from any 8000-level RCB course for which prerequisites have been satisfied (except MBA 8041, MBA 8121, or a Group B course that has been exempted). Students choosing to major in real estate or risk management and insurance must take their elective in their major area or take one additional course.

Optional -- Group F: Major (6 additional semester hours). Requirements of graduate-level coursework for each available major are specified. Majors are available in the areas in which concentrations are available as listed above, except: electronic commerce, hospitality administration, and health administration. Proposals for majors in electronic commerce and hospitality administration have been approved by the RCB faculty and are pending approval at the university and university system levels.

Satisfaction of Curriculum Content Standards.

The perspectives that form the context for business specified in Standard C.1.1 are covered in the required courses of the MBA program as indicated in Table C--8.

Standard C.1.3.a is satisfied by requiring the Group A foundation courses (except MBA 8041) and the four core courses in Group B -- a total of 21 semester hours.

Standard C.1.3.b for 30 semester hours beyond the core is satisfied by requiring MBA 8041 in Group A, the 15 hours in Group C, the 12 hours in Group D, and the 3-hour elective in Group E -- total of 33 semester hours. The 18 hours in Groups C and E are outside the area of concentration.

Table C--8

Coverage of Perspectives that Form the Context for Business in MBA Program

Course

Ethical

Issues

Global

Issues

Political, Social

Issues

Legal, Regulatory, Environmental

Issues

Technological

Issues

Demographic

Diversity

MBA 8403

 

**

**

**

**

 

MBA 8412

*

*

*

 

*

**

MBA 8423

**

*

**

***

 

 

MBA 8452

 

*

*

*

***

 

MBA 8473

*

*

**

**

***

*

MBA 8622

*

**

*

*

 

 

MBA 8642

*

**

*

*

*

*

MBA 8683

*

*

*

*

*

*

MBA 8993

 

**

**

**

**

 

IB 8990

*

***

**

**

**

**

Legend: *** = Major coverage (more than 25% of course content)

** = Moderate coverage (10% to 25% of course content)

* = Minor coverage (less than 10% of course content)

blank = No significant coverage

With respect to Standard C.1.3.c, the college's 1998-1999 Graduate Bulletin (p. 65) states that the MBA program is developed on the assumption that students enter the program with:

In addition, Table C--9 shows the extent to which each required course requires students to apply and be evaluated on each of the four skills specified in Standard C.1.3.c.

Table C--9

Requirements for Skills Application in MBA Program

Course

Written Communication

Oral

Communication

Quantitative Analysis

Computer Usage

MBA 8403

***

**

***

**

MBA 8412

***

**

 

*

MBA 8423

**

**

 

**

MBA 8452

*

 

***

 

MBA 8473

***

**

*

**

MBA 8622

*

*

***

**

MBA 8642

***

***

**

 

MBA 8683

**

**

***

*

MBA 8993

***

***

**

*

IB 8990

***

**

*

**

Legend: *** = Major requirement (more than 25% of course requirements)

** = Moderate requirement (10% to 25% of course requirements)

* = Minor requirement (less than 10% of course requirements)

blank = No significant requirement

With respect to Standard C.1.3.d:

Standard C.1.3.e is satisfied primarily through the required capstone course -- MBA 8993 or IB 8990. Both courses are cross-functional, strategic, and international in orientation; and they employ the case methodology. In addition, students are encouraged to use their elective to take MBA 8880, Field Study in Business. This course involves students working in cross-functional teams of four or five to address in depth a problem/project for a company in the Atlanta area. This self-evaluation indicates, however, that the integration of the core areas and the application of cross-functional approaches to organizational issues is the weakest aspect of the MBA program design. The difficulty stems in part from the size of the program and the number of instructors who teach the required courses in Groups B and C. Additional creative efforts are needed to strengthen this aspect of the program.

Assessment Plan. Table C--10 presents the assessment plan for the regular/flexible MBA program. The results of the 1998-99 application of the assessment plan are presented in Reference C-2.

Table C--10 Assessment Plan for MBA Program

 

Program Objectives

 

Expected Outcomes

 

Assessment Methods

 

To develop creative decision-making skills that incorporate global, ethical and culturally diverse dimensions.

The student should be able to present a reasoned analysis and justify recommendations that integrate functional, global, ethical and culturally diverse dimensions in the business decision process.

 

Assessment by a Faculty Review Team of assigned cases for student analysis and presentation in a capstone course, on a sampled basis.

The student should be able to develop and defend a business/ corporate strategy in a global and culturally diverse environment.

Assessment by a Faculty Review Team of project involving a business/corporate strategy presentation in a capstone course, on a sampled basis.

 

To develop skills to assess/ diagnose organizational performance.

The student should be able to identify and focus on critical success factors for a business unit.

Use a portfolio approach for a project review by a Faculty Review Team (e.g., class projects throughout the curriculum will be sampled by the Faculty Review Team for assessment of expected outcomes.

The student should be able to analyze an organization=s strengths, weaknesses, structure and performance from operational, marketing, information, financial and human resource perspectives.

 

Same as above.

 

 

To develop business leadership skills.

The student should be able to demonstrate leadership skills including: inspiring a shared vision, challenging conventional processes, motivating others.

Survey instruments involving student self-assessment and student peer review of leadership skills.

The student should be on a career path toward attaining/enhancing a leadership position soon after completing the MBA program.

Alumni tracking survey within one to five years from date of program completion for analysis of employment, promotion, salary and other pertinent data to assess demonstration of applied leadership skills.

 

To provide skills for individuals to be contributing members of an effective work team.

The student will be able to contribute as a productive member of a management-level work team that is responsible for a specified task.

Survey of faculty members who use work teams in their courses on assessment of effective team functioning.

Survey instruments involving student self-assessment and student peer review of role as a contributing member of a team.

The student will be able to contribute functional expertise to a problem solving cooperative project.

 

Survey of faculty members who use work teams in their courses on assessment of effective team functioning.

Survey instruments involving student self-assessment and student peer review of role as a contributing member of a team.

 

To provide students the opportunity to gain depth in a field of study through specialization or to acquire additional breadth in business administration through selection of electives.

 

The student should derive additional educational value from the group of selected electives.

 

Self-assessment by student at time of graduation, and two to five years after graduation, of value gained from completing business electives.

Five years after graduation, conduct analyses of placement, employment, promotion, salary and other pertinent data to gauge effectiveness of electives, with special emphasis on value distinctions between concentrations and majors, and between general business electives and discipline-specific routes selected by students.

In addition to the assessment measures specified in Table C--10, the RCB took part in the 1998 AACSB/EBI Part-Time MBA Student Satisfaction Study. For purposes of comparison, the MBA Program Improvement Committee chose the following six schools as peer institutions from among the schools available based on perceived similarities in the qualifications of the part-time MBA students served:

The RCB part-time MBA program ranked second among the seven comparative schools (and 25th among the 79 schools participating) in terms of overall satisfaction. The RCB program was rated especially strong with respect to: (a) the quality of teaching in the individual disciplines and (b) placement/career services. Areas of relative dissatisfaction highlighted by the survey were: (a) the amount of work required in elective courses and (b) the international perspective and team experiences in the curriculum. Table C--11 presents the rating on overall satisfaction for each of the years that the RCB has participated in the study. The data indicate that overall satisfaction improved from 1996 to 1998 (although there was a slight decrease from 1997 to 1998), and that the rating for the RCB was higher than the means for all public programs and all programs (public and private) in each of the three years.

 

 

Table C--11

Results of AACSB/EBI Part-Time MBA Student Satisfaction Study

Student Ratings on Overall Satisfaction, 1996-1998

 

 

 

Overall Satisfaction Rating*

 

1996

 

1997

 

1998

 

Robinson College of Business

 

4.73

 

5.13

 

5.11

 

Mean for all Public Programs

 

4.69

 

4.62

 

4.88

 

Mean for all Programs

 

4.61

 

4.60

 

4.78

*Ratings on a scale from 1 to 7, with 7 representing highest level of satisfaction.

The college also conducts an exit survey of each year's MBA graduating class to collect data on their perceptions regarding a number of dimensions of program quality. Table C--12 presents the results of the surveys for the last five years with respect to the graduate's overall rating of the MBA program on a 5-point scale. In each year, the mean rating was between "good" and "very good," and, in general, the mean rating has been trending upward over the five-year period.

Table C--12

MBA Graduates'Overall Rating of MBA Program Quality

 

 

 

1994

 

1995

 

1996

 

1997

 

1998

 

Mean Rating*

 

3.47

 

3.69

 

3.68

 

3.93

 

3.81

*1=poor, 2=fair, 3=good, 4=very good, 5=excellent

 

 

At the end of each academic term, students complete an evaluation of the instructor's performance. Included on the survey form is an item asking students to rate on a 5-point scale how Aworthwhile" the course was. Table C--13 presents the mean ratings for all sections of all MBA-prefixed courses in the fall terms for the last five years. The mean rating has been consistently in the range between Amoderately worthwhile" and Aextremely worthwhile," and it has increased slightly over the five-year period.

Table C--13

MBA Student Ratings of All MBA-Prefixed Courses

 

 

 

1994

 

1995

 

1996

 

1997

 

1998

 

Mean Rating*

 

3.8

 

3.8

 

3.9

 

4.0

 

3.9

*1=not at all worthwhile, 3=moderately worthwhile, 5=extremely worthwhile

U.S. News & World Report conducts annual surveys of business school deans and MBA program directors asking them to rank part-time MBA programs with respect to quality. The results are published in March of each year. Table C--14 presents the results of those surveys for the last five years. With the exception of the drop from 4th to 6th in 1999, the perceived relative quality of the RCB MBA program has been increasing consistently over the last five years and has been in the top ten for the last four years.

Table C--14

U.S. News & World Report Survey Ranking of RCB MBA Program

 

Year of Publication

 

1995

 

1996

 

1997

 

1998

 

1999

 

RCB MBA Program Ranking

 

15

 

10

 

6

 

4

 

6

Source: U.S. News & World Report, March 1999

Executive Master of Business Administration

This part-time, lockstep program is designed for experienced managers. Typical EMBA students have at least 10 years of work experience, have undertaken significant duties within their organization, and have clear potential for top management. The program requires four semesters, and classes meet one full day each week on alternating Fridays and Saturdays. Two overseas business visits are included--usually to countries in South America and Asia.

EMBA Program Content and Structure.

Group A: Core Courses (18 semester hours)

EMBA 8000.

Introduction to Executive Management (3 hours)

EMBA 8007.

Fundamentals of Accounting (1.5 hours)

EMBA 8100.

Organizational Behavior for Executives (3 hours)

EMBA 8250.

Strategic Marketing Management (3 hours)

EMBA 8355.

Operations and Quality Management (1.5 hours)

EMBA 8400.

Managerial Economics (3 hours)

EMBA 8450.

Asset Valuation, Analysis and Selection (3 hours)

Group B: Required Courses Beyond the Core (30.5 semester hours)

EMBA 8005.

Cross-Cultural Business Practices (2 hours)

EMBA 8050.

Accounting for Financial Analysis (3 hours)

EMBA 8150.

Decision Sciences Modeling (3 hours)

EMBA 8200.

Legal and Ethical Environment of Business (1.5 hours)

EMBA 8205.

Regulatory Environment of Business (1.5 hours)

EMBA 8350.

Project and Systems Management (1.5 hours)

EMBA 8500.

Corporate Financial Structures (3 hours)

EMBA 8550.

Cost Analysis (1.5 hours)

EMBA 8555.

Management Control Systems (1.5 hours)

EMBA 8600.

Information Technology Infrastructure and Deployment (1.5 hours)

EMBA 8605.

Information Systems Structure and Strategies (1.5 hours)

EMBA 8650.

International Management Practices I (3 hours)-overseas business visit

EMBA 8655.

International Management Practices II (3 hours)-overseas business visit

EMBA 8750.

Strategic Planning and Policy Formulation (3 hours)

Satisfaction of Curriculum Content Standards.

The perspectives that form the context for business specified in Standard C.1.1 are covered in the required courses of the EMBA program as indicated in Table C--15

Standard C.1.3.a is satisfied through the Group A core courses totaling 18 semester hours.

Standard C.1.3.b is satisfied through the Group B courses beyond the core totaling 30.5 semester hours. There is no area of specialization in the EMBA program.

Table C--15

Coverage of Perspectives that Form the Context for Business in Executive MBA Program

Course

Ethical

Issues

Global

Issues

Political,

Social Issues

Legal, Regulatory, Environmental Issues

Technological

Issues

Demographic

Diversity

EMBA 8000

 

*

 

 

 

 

EMBA 8005

*

***

***

***

**

*

EMBA 8007

 

*

 

*

*

 

EMBA 8050

**

**

*

***

***

*

EMBA 8100

*

**

 

 

*

**

EMBA 8150

 

 

*

 

**

 

EMBA 8200

***

**

**

***

*

*

EMBA 8205

***

**

**

***

*

*

EMBA 8250

*

**

*

*

 

*

EMBA 8350

*

 

*

*

*

 

EMBA 8355

*

**

*

*

***

 

EMBA 8400

 

**

**

**

**

 

EMBA 8450

 

*

 

**

**

 

EMBA 8500

*

**

*

*

 

 

EMBA 8550

**

 

*

*

*

 

EMBA 8555

**

*

 

*

*

 

EMBA 8600

*

*

**

 

***

 

EMBA 8605

*

**

**

**

***

*

EMBA 8650 & 8655

*

***

**

**

*

**

EMBA 8750

*

***

**

*

**

*

Legend: *** = Major coverage (more than 25% of course content)

** = Moderate coverage (10% to 25% of course content)

* = Minor coverage (less than 10% of course content)

blank = No significant coverage

With respect to Standard C.1.3.c, EMBA 8000 introduces and provides initial coverage of six themes that continue through the entire program. These themes are oral communications, written communications, quantitative analysis, computer skills, interpersonal skills, and an international perspective. In addition, Table C--16 shows the extent to which each required course requires students to apply and be evaluated on each of the four skills specified in Standard C.1.3.c.

With respect to Standard C.1.3.d, the EMBA program is lockstep and contains no electives. The program is structured to provide breadth through a set of courses that have been carefully designed for general managers at the executive level. As compared with the regular/flexible MBA program, the EMBA curriculum places special emphasis on financial management and international/cross-cultural business practices.

Standard C.1.3.e is satisfied primarily through EMBA 8750, which is cross-functional and strategic in orientation and employs the case methodology. In addition:

Table C--16

Requirements for Skills Application in Executive MBA Program

 

Course

Written Communication

Oral

Communication

Quantitative

Analysis

Computer

Usage

MBA 8000

 

*

 

 

EMBA 8005

***

***

 

 

EMBA 8007

 

 

**

***

EMBA 8050

***

***

**

**

EMBA 8100

***

**

 

 

EMBA 8150

*

*

***

***

EMBA 8200

**

**

 

 

EMBA 8205

**

**

 

 

EMBA 8250

***

**

**

**

EMBA 8350

***

*

***

**

EMBA 8355

*

*

***

*

EMBA 8400

***

**

***

**

EMBA 8450

**

**

***

**

EMBA 8500

***

**

**

**

EMBA 8550

**

**

*

*

EMBA 8555

*

**

**

*

EMBA 8600

**

*

 

**

EMBA 8605

***

***

 

**

EMBA 8650 & 8655

***

***

 

 

EMBA 8750

***

**

**

**

Legend: *** = Major requirement (more than 25% of course requirements)

** = Moderate requirement (10% to 25% of course requirements)

* = Minor requirement (less than 10% of course requirements)

blank = No significant coverage

Assessment Plan. The EMBA program uses the same assessment plan as described earlier for the regular/flexible MBA program, except that the final program objective of the regular/flexible MBA program relating to the opportunity to specialize or select electives is not relevant to the EMBA program.

In addition to assessment measures employed in the program assessment plan, the RCB took part in the Executive MBA Council's 1997-98 Student Satisfaction Exit Survey. A total of 63 schools participated in the survey, of which 28 were public institutions. As indicated in Table C--17, the mean rating of the RCB EMBA program with respect to Aoverall program performance" was higher than the means for all public programs and all programs (public and private). No results were provided with respect to relative rankings of programs.

 

 

Table C--17

EMBA Graduates'Rating of Overall Program Performance

 

Mean Rating*

Robinson College of Business

9.00

Mean for All Public Programs

8.21

Mean for All Programs

8.35

*Ratings on a scale from 0 to 10, with 10 representing highest level of performance

As with other programs, EMBA students complete an instructor/course evaluation at the end of each term, which includes an item asking them to rate on a 5-point scale how Aworthwhile" the course was. Table C--18 presents the mean ratings for all EMBA courses taught in each of the last four academic years and the fall semester of 1998. The mean rating has been consistently in the range between Amoderately worthwhile" and Aextremely worthwhile," and the trend has been up in general. The decline in the fall semester of 1998 may be attributable to the facts that: (a) this was the first term under the semester system, and/or (b) only EMBA courses taught in the fall semester are included in this mean.

Table C--18

EMBA Student Ratings of All EMBA Courses

 

 

 

1994-95

 

1995-96

 

1996-97

 

1997-98

 

Fall, 1998

 

Mean Rating*

 

3.9

 

3.9

 

4.2

 

4.3

 

4.1

*1=not at all worthwhile, 3=moderately worthwhile, 5=extremely worthwhile

Concentrated Master of Business Administration

This full-time program is designed for students with at least two years of work experience. The required courses are taken lockstep. During the fall semester of 1998, the college's Executive Committee proposed the elimination of the CMBA program, because the college had never been able to recruit a sufficient number of students to justify the resources required to support the program. The Graduate Program Council reviewed the proposal and recommended its approval by the college faculty. At the fall semester faculty meeting, the RCB faculty voted to delete the CMBA program and all CMBA-prefixed courses effective with the 1999-2000 Graduate Bulletin. Resources currently devoted to the CMBA program will be redeployed, primarily to satisfying the growing demand for the regular/flexible MBA program. Since the CMBA program will cease to exist, space will not be devoted here to describing the program content and structure (Reference S-2, 1998-1999 Graduate Bulletin, pp.73-74), how the program met the curriculum content standards, or the program assessment plan.

SPECIALIZED MASTER'S PROGRAMS

Although the RCB's nationally ranked MBA and Executive MBA programs receive the greatest emphasis, the college also offers several specialized master's programs that are nationally recognized for excellence. Moreover, the size of the college provides the opportunity to recruit highly specialized faculty, who can support specialized master's programs. Thus, RCB is able to offer a wide variety of such programs within the context of its mission to prepare its students "...with the knowledge and skills needed to remain effective in a global, culturally diverse and technologically advanced world that is characterized by rapid change and complex interdependencies."

Satisfaction of Curriculum Content Standards. The missions of the specialized master's programs are presented in Section M (Mission and Objectives) of this report. The program objectives for each specialized master's program are presented in Reference C-2 in conjunction with the program assessment plans. As indicated in those objectives, each program satisfies Standard C.1.4.a by preparing students for specialized roles in business, management, and related professions. Each specialized master's program is clearly distinguishable from a general management degree. In fact, a specialization in strategy and entrepreneurship within the management major of the Master of Science program was eliminated in the fall of 1996 due to the potential similarity of its curriculum to the MBA program.

With respect to Standard C.1.4.b, every specialized master's program (with the possible exception of the Master of Science, Major in Finance as noted in Table C--19) requires a minimum of 30 semester hours of graduate coursework, of which more than 12 hours (actually no fewer than 20 hours) are in the area of specialization. Table C--19 summarizes the credit hour requirements of each program. Not included in the requirements shown in Table C--19 are "foundation requirements," which are specified for each program and can typically be satisfied with undergraduate courses.

In addition to the programs listed in Table C--19, a proposal for a new Master of Science in Electronic Commerce has been approved by the RCB faculty and is pending approval at the university and university system levels. This program will require 30 semester hours, of which at least 21 hours are in the electronic commerce specialization, although they involve several academic/functional areas.

Table C--19

Minimum Semester Hour Requirements

for Specialized Master's Programs

Specialized Master's Program / Major

Minimum

Semester Hours

Minimum

Hours in

Specialization

Master of Actuarial Science

32

20

Master of International Business

33

21

Master of Professional Accountancy

30

21

Master of Science, Major in Business Economics

30